No child...no person, for that matter, can know it all. Everyone is going to have holes and gaps in their knowledge bank. That's why life long learning is such a critical thing, IMO. If you know you don't know something and you'd like to know it, go learn it. The problem is that after 13 years in the public school system and 4-8 years of college, a person's love of learning is pretty much shot (not to mention trying to get a career off the ground and repay sometimes massive student loans) so the last thing the average person wants to do is initiate learning on their own about the subject of their choice - something homeschool kids have grown up doing.
There is a level at which a person is functional and there is a level at which people are deemed "highly educated", "well-read", whatever the current catch phrase is for it these days. Sadly, people most often equate many years in school with "highly educated" and the two are mutually exclusive (as in you couldn't possibly be highly educated or well-read if you haven't spent 13 years in public school and 6-8 years in college). No matter that kids coming out of public school are barely functional and definately cannot be considered "highly educated". This is the notion that homeschhoolers run directly against since our kids technically skip those 13 years in school and may or may not choose to go on to college or grab a post-secondary education unconventionally.
When you buck the status quo, those who have not bothered to check into it for themselves will believe just about anything - most of it is negative, unfortunately and they'll do just about anything to put it away in their brains as nonsense so they can feel justified in continuing doing things the way they're doing things and that they're in the right while we're very much in the wrong - facts are of no consequence in this thought process either. This is the essence of the anti-homeschool contingent, IMO.Statistics: Posted by Calla_Dragon — Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:01 pm
]]>