Homeschool World Forums     Home     Mall     Catalog     Articles     Contests     Events     Groups     Forum     Contact  
Homeschool World Forum Forum Index Homeschool World Forum
Read thousands of forum posts on topics such as homeschool law, getting started, curriculum, special needs, homeschool vs public school, and much, much more!
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Learning styles

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Homeschool World Forum Forum Index -> Suggest a Topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cornopean
User


Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:40 pm    Post subject: Learning styles Reply with quote

I have this beef with all the talk about learning styles.

The general opinion appears to be:

1. Each child has a unique learning styles;
2. Effective teachers adapt their lessons to appeal to each learning style.

I agree with #1. I disagree with #2. Shouldn't teachers try to correct and train a student's learning style?

I think most agree that the following are the major learning styles.
    visual (learn by seeing)
    aural or audial (learn by hearing)
    reading/writing (learn by processing text)
    kinesthetic or practical (learn by doing).


Now I think teachers need to try and train students into the text-based learning style. dont we always say we have to teach students how to learn? seems to me if we cater to a given learning style we might be handicapping that student by not teaching him/her the one learning style that will keep that student learning all their life long.

what you think?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Princess_Fyara
User


Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 39
Location: Idaho

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmm. Interesting thoughts. Very Happy

I would have to say, a good teacher should encourage development of all learning pathways, not catering to one style alone, but using the one that is the emphasis, to associate with the others. A blind child, for instance, can not be a visual learner, but by using his kinesthetic and auditory learning tendencies, he can develop his processing power, to read and write, and solve problems. I would definitely say that a teacher should be aware of the child's learning abilities. Learning is done by connecting feelings, images, sounds, tastes, and smells. Using all of the senses will enable a child to comprehend more, but ignoring the tendency in one over an other would be a big mistake.
_________________
My Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Theodore
Moderator


Joined: 06 Oct 2005
Posts: 2122
Location: Missouri, US

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:51 am    Post subject: The important thing is learning, not so much the way you... Reply with quote

Well, the important thing is learning, not so much the way you learn. Given, you need decent reading/writing skills regardless of your learning style, but there's no reason why you should be forced into learning (or rather trying to learn) one way just because that's the way most other people find easiest.
_________________
Homeschool Articles - Events - Support Groups
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tabz
User


Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 89

PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very true Theodore. The only time you should be forced is when you're paying tuition in college (jusssssssssst kidding).

People are individuals and should be treated as such.
_________________
MINDsprinting * My Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SOPHIE
User


Joined: 03 Dec 2005
Posts: 21
Location: Plano, Texas

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:01 pm    Post subject: learning styles Reply with quote

I think children tend to gravitate toward the style that suits them best. There may be times when they need a little guidance in how they can use their learning style, if they don't come up with something on their own. Someone who is 'hands-on' will choose hands-on activities to reinforce something they are learning or having trouble with. I believe learning styles are God-given and are wonderful to watch in action--especially when it helps them hit the bulls-eye.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cornopean
User


Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:12 pm    Post subject: Re: The important thing is learning, not so much the way you Reply with quote

Theodore wrote:
Well, the important thing is learning, not so much the way you learn. Given, you need decent reading/writing skills regardless of your learning style, but there's no reason why you should be forced into learning (or rather trying to learn) one way just because that's the way most other people find easiest.

I respectfully disagree with this. I think that when children aren't taught to learn in the 'reading' mode, they are shortchanged for life. if they are going to be life-long learners, then they are going to have to be able to learn by processing text. they can't go to school all their life.

cornopean
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Princess_Fyara
User


Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 39
Location: Idaho

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:04 pm    Post subject: Re: The important thing is learning, not so much the way you Reply with quote

cornopean wrote:
they are going to have to be able to learn by processing text. they can't go to school all their life.


This is partly true, but text is not the only way we learn. Yes, Children need to learn to process text, but learning how to observe things and think critically, (converting to productivity) is far more important in a practical sense. Not every form of learning requires reading, though reading is highly beneficial if you want to learn certain things, it, (in my honest opinion) is not the best learning pathway, as it is not the first learning pathway. It's a great tool though, and we should most certainly learn how to learn from text.
_________________
My Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Theodore
Moderator


Joined: 06 Oct 2005
Posts: 2122
Location: Missouri, US

PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 2:19 am    Post subject: Reading comprehension comes naturally if... Reply with quote

Quote:
I respectfully disagree with this. I think that when children aren't taught to learn in the 'reading' mode, they are shortchanged for life. if they are going to be life-long learners, then they are going to have to be able to learn by processing text. they can't go to school all their life.


That's just reading comprehension, and it comes naturally if you read a fair amount and have the proper basing in phonics. Everyone should know how to read well, true, but just because you CAN learn through reading doesn't mean you HAVE to learn through reading. A lot of things are more easily learned through visuals or audio or manipulatives, and why make your life more painful than it has to be?

Nobody here is claiming reading is unnecessary Smile
_________________
Homeschool Articles - Events - Support Groups
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
momo3boys
User


Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 574
Location: Western Mass

PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 8:16 pm    Post subject: Hands on Reply with quote

I have a child that is a definite visual and hands-on learner. If I forced him to be a different person I would be changing who he was made to be. A plumber doesn't need to have great reading comprehension and an accountant doesn't need to be good with his hands. We all need to know how to do a little of everything but when it comes to the real world we dont need to BE everyone. That is why we have diversity and that is a good thing!
_________________
Phi 4:13 I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nep
User


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I tend to think the foundation of the "three R's" is essential to learning- that being said one can learn to read and write and do math in various ways which reach out to the different styles.

Just because your top critical skill is auditory does not mean you cannot or should not learn to read well. A child of that mentality can still learn to read well and come to enjoy reading IF they are taught to read within their style. The problem, in my opinion, of forcing one into text learning by one path, is that they have found that children who have dyslexia did NOT have to have dyslexia. This is because learning styles have to do with the way each person's brain is geared. One cannot change that nor apparently mold that. However, Phonics can be taught to all learning styles. It is one thing the whole language people had right, the focus in reaching all styles so more children could be literate with out being put into "special" classes and then being tagged and having a disablitiy to boot. I guess that is something to consider here- by forcing children to learn the foundaton of learning one way- because they cannot change their brain's wiring- actually creates a disability where there need not have been one.

There are methods of teaching reading with phonics that use each of the critical thinking pathways. You don't have to teach just one part to one child and another to the next (and maybe get it wrong if you didn't evaluate the child's style correct). You use the complete program and it in a sense catches each child enabling them to become good readers regardless of their style. So though they may not "get" the visual aspect, because there is also auditory, etc. alongside of the first it opens the world of reading to all people of all styles. It is simple, but specific, so it does not cater to one type nor slow anyone down - which in my mind is the only concern of teaching strictly to a more unique style anyway.

Okay, I am rambling again. Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cornopean
User


Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Hands on Reply with quote

momo3boys wrote:
I have a child that is a definite visual and hands-on learner. If I forced him to be a different person I would be changing who he was made to be. A plumber doesn't need to have great reading comprehension and an accountant doesn't need to be good with his hands. We all need to know how to do a little of everything but when it comes to the real world we dont need to BE everyone. That is why we have diversity and that is a good thing!

but God takes your child and (if they are regenerate) makes them into something they aren't. yes?
I disagree that a plumber doesnt have to have reading comprehension. I think he does if he is going to be a lifelong learner.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Princess_Fyara
User


Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 39
Location: Idaho

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Hands on Reply with quote

cornopean wrote:

I disagree that a plumber doesnt have to have reading comprehension. I think he does if he is going to be a lifelong learner.


Does a plumber have to be a life long text-learner? If he doesn't have a need to read extensively, he shouldn't have to be as good at reading as a Lawyer or a College Professor. It's basically a waste of time if all he will ever read are road signs and product labels. Yes he should know how to read, but no, he shouldn't have to specialize in reading. Cool Just my thoughts.
_________________
My Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
momo3boys
User


Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 574
Location: Western Mass

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does everyone want to be a life long learner. I know I do but I live with one person, my father-in-law, Who never reads more than a newspaper or the TV guide. He is happy where he is and doesn't feel the need to have great reading comprehension. He is happy if he can fish and hunt. Not a lot of reading required.
_________________
Phi 4:13 I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BroGeorge7
User


Joined: 03 Oct 2006
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:08 am    Post subject: Reading comprehension Reply with quote

momo3boys wrote
Quote:
Does everyone want to be a life long learner. I know I do but I live with one person, my father-in-law, Who never reads more than a newspaper or the TV guide. He is happy where he is and doesn't feel the need to have great reading comprehension. He is happy if he can fish and hunt. Not a lot of reading required.


With utmost respect for your Father-in-law and others who do not have a great reading comprehension, I do not think that we should sluff off reading comprehension for the sake of ease or convenience. The greatest source of learning for the greatest needs of our lives is in text format--The Bible. I think if we say that we are content with reading road signs and labels only, we are saying that we are content on missing out on the great blessings of the revelation of God. This also means if you fail to give your child the ability to grasp what he reads, you are also robbing him of such blessings as well. I do believe that God desires all peoples to be life long learners.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Homeschool World Forum Forum Index -> Suggest a Topic All times are GMT - 6 Hours (CST)
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Homeschool World Terms of Use  •  Privacy Policy  •  Copyright ©1993-Now Home Life, Inc.