Pro-life vs Pro-choice
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:29 am
I disagree, it is a decision acknowledging universally something called universal abstracts or pretending that abstracts are merely conventions. If you believe they are merely conventions then there is nothing wrong with letting each group decide. Yet, if universal abstracts exist, then issues like murder will destroy and divide a nation... as seen in the civil war.
I do not believe morality is a convention and thus a universal that should be decided universally.
Currently we have had over 50 million who have died due to abortion. This is not a debate about numbers of people, this is a discussion about whether universal abstracts like murder (abortion, genocide, etc) should be handled at the federal or state level.
So, you are essentially saying that if a state wished to enact genocide they should be allowed. Is that your stand?